Difference between revisions of "05/21/2007 21:00:00 UTC"
(→Comment Section) |
(→Comment Section) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=Comment Section= | =Comment Section= | ||
| − | + | Perhaps due to the location of the spacecraft, I cannot see anything in STEREO to cause the ICME. I also see no significant Halo CMEs in LASCO during the days leading up to the in-situ signature. The Ying Liu paper listed in the reference section dealt only with the in-situ data, so I am not sure about the CME connection for this event. (Hess) | |
=Image Data= | =Image Data= | ||
Revision as of 11:01, 9 July 2013
Comment Section
Perhaps due to the location of the spacecraft, I cannot see anything in STEREO to cause the ICME. I also see no significant Halo CMEs in LASCO during the days leading up to the in-situ signature. The Ying Liu paper listed in the reference section dealt only with the in-situ data, so I am not sure about the CME connection for this event. (Hess)
Image Data
In-Situ Data
A combination of SWEPAM and MAG data from the ACE Satellite:
Error creating thumbnail: File missing
Error creating thumbnail: File missing
Error creating thumbnail: File missing
The blue lines are an approximation of the CME cloud and the red line denotes the shock.
Video Data
References
- compression of the magnetic cloud through a high speed stream (Rouillard et al. paper)
- Liu, Y., Luhmann, J. G., Huttunen, K. E. J., Lin, R. P., Bale, S. D., Russell, C. T., & Galvin, A. B. (2008). Reconstruction of the 2007 May 22 Magnetic Cloud: How Much Can We Trust the Flux-Rope Geometry of CMEs? Astrophysical Journal, 677(2), L133–L136. doi:10.1086/587839
