Difference between revisions of "05/28/2010 21:00:00 UTC"
(→Comment Section) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=Comment Section= | =Comment Section= | ||
*A "well-behaved" CME-ICME event | *A "well-behaved" CME-ICME event | ||
| − | *Two consecutive halo CMEs originated from the Sun from almost the same region, one at ~ 18 UT, May 23, and the other at ~ 14 UT, May 24. The question is we should expect to find two consecutive ICMEs at 1 AU, as well as in SECCHI HI observations. Is this kind of double CMEs showing up? | + | *Two consecutive halo CMEs originated from the Sun from almost the same region, one at ~ 18 UT, May 23, and the other at ~ 14 UT, May 24. The question is we should expect to find two consecutive ICMEs at 1 AU, as well as in SECCHI HI observations. Is this kind of double CMEs showing up? |
| + | *Lugaz et al. 2012 ApJ (CME-CME interaction, probably deflection as a result) | ||
=Image Data= | =Image Data= | ||
Revision as of 04:53, 19 June 2013
Comment Section
- A "well-behaved" CME-ICME event
- Two consecutive halo CMEs originated from the Sun from almost the same region, one at ~ 18 UT, May 23, and the other at ~ 14 UT, May 24. The question is we should expect to find two consecutive ICMEs at 1 AU, as well as in SECCHI HI observations. Is this kind of double CMEs showing up?
- Lugaz et al. 2012 ApJ (CME-CME interaction, probably deflection as a result)
Image Data
In-Situ Data
A combination of SWEPAM and MAG data from the ACE Satellite:
Error creating thumbnail: File missing
Error creating thumbnail: File missing
Error creating thumbnail: File missing
The blue lines are an approximation of the CME cloud and the red line denotes the shock.
Video Data
References
- Lugaz, N., Farrugia, C. J., Davies, J. A., Möstl, C., Davis, C. J., Roussev, I. I., & Temmer, M. (2012). The Deflection of the Two Interacting Coronal Mass Ejections of 2010 May 23-24 as Revealed by Combined in Situ Measurements and Heliospheric Imaging. Astrophysical Journal, 759(1), 68. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/759/1/68
