Latest revision as of 23:20, 8 October 2016

Comment Section

Perhaps due to the location of the spacecraft, I cannot see anything in STEREO to cause the ICME. I also see no significant Halo CMEs in LASCO during the days leading up to the in-situ signature. The Ying Liu paper listed in the reference section dealt only with the in-situ data, so I am not sure about the CME connection for this event. (Hess)
Three density peaks seemed to correspond to (1) sector boundary, (2) small ejecta, and (3) CIR interface, respectively (Jie Zhang)

A combination of SWEPAM and MAG data from the ACE Satellite:

Error creating thumbnail: File missing

The blue lines are an approximation of the CME cloud and the red line denotes the shock.

compression of the magnetic cloud through a high speed stream (Rouillard et al. paper)
Liu, Y., Luhmann, J. G., Huttunen, K. E. J., Lin, R. P., Bale, S. D., Russell, C. T., & Galvin, A. B. (2008). Reconstruction of the 2007 May 22 Magnetic Cloud: How Much Can We Trust the Flux-Rope Geometry of CMEs? Astrophysical Journal, 677(2), L133–L136. doi:10.1086/587839

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 =Comment Section=
-Partially due to the location of the spacecraft perhaps, I cannot see anything in STEREO to cause. I also see no significant Halo CMEs in LASCO during the days leading up to the in-situ signature
+*Perhaps due to the location of the spacecraft, I cannot see anything in STEREO to cause the ICME. I also see no significant Halo CMEs in LASCO during the days leading up to the in-situ signature. The Ying Liu paper listed in the reference section dealt only with the in-situ data, so I am not sure about the CME connection for this event. (Hess)
+*Three density peaks seemed to correspond to (1) sector boundary, (2) small ejecta, and (3) CIR interface, respectively (Jie Zhang)
 =Image Data=