05/21/2007 21:00:00 UTC - Revision history

Jie Zhang: /* Comment Section */

2016-10-09T04:20:25Z

‎Comment Section

2016-10-09T04:19:27Z

‎Comment Section

2013-07-09T16:01:55Z

‎Comment Section

2013-07-09T15:53:18Z

‎Comment Section

2013-07-02T18:37:53Z

2013-07-01T17:17:01Z

‎In-Situ Data

2013-07-01T16:24:39Z

2013-06-24T18:44:58Z

2013-06-19T08:48:52Z

2013-06-19T08:48:34Z

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 =Comment Section=
-==Perhaps due to the location of the spacecraft, I cannot see anything in STEREO to cause the ICME. I also see no significant Halo CMEs in LASCO during the days leading up to the in-situ signature. The Ying Liu paper listed in the reference section dealt only with the in-situ data, so I am not sure about the CME connection for this event. (Hess)
+*Perhaps due to the location of the spacecraft, I cannot see anything in STEREO to cause the ICME. I also see no significant Halo CMEs in LASCO during the days leading up to the in-situ signature. The Ying Liu paper listed in the reference section dealt only with the in-situ data, so I am not sure about the CME connection for this event. (Hess)
-==three density peaks seemed to correspond to (1) sector boundary, (2) small ejecta, and (3) CIR interface, respectively (Jie Zhang)
+*Three density peaks seemed to correspond to (1) sector boundary, (2) small ejecta, and (3) CIR interface, respectively (Jie Zhang)
 =Image Data=

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 =Comment Section=
-Perhaps due to the location of the spacecraft, I cannot see anything in STEREO to cause the ICME. I also see no significant Halo CMEs in LASCO during the days leading up to the in-situ signature. The Ying Liu paper listed in the reference section dealt only with the in-situ data, so I am not sure about the CME connection for this event. (Hess)
+==Perhaps due to the location of the spacecraft, I cannot see anything in STEREO to cause the ICME. I also see no significant Halo CMEs in LASCO during the days leading up to the in-situ signature. The Ying Liu paper listed in the reference section dealt only with the in-situ data, so I am not sure about the CME connection for this event. (Hess)
 =Image Data=

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 =Comment Section=
-Partially due to the location of the spacecraft perhaps, I cannot see anything in STEREO to cause. I also see no significant Halo CMEs in LASCO during the days leading up to the in-situ signature
+Perhaps due to the location of the spacecraft, I cannot see anything in STEREO to cause the ICME. I also see no significant Halo CMEs in LASCO during the days leading up to the in-situ signature. The Ying Liu paper listed in the reference section dealt only with the in-situ data, so I am not sure about the CME connection for this event. (Hess)
 =Image Data=

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:53, 9 July 2013
Line 1:		Line 1:
	=Comment Section=		=Comment Section=
		+	Partially due to the location of the spacecraft perhaps, I cannot see anything in STEREO to cause. I also see no significant Halo CMEs in LASCO during the days leading up to the in-situ signature

	=Image Data=		=Image Data=

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 ==In-Situ Data==
 A combination of SWEPAM and MAG data from the ACE Satellite: <br />
+[[File:plot_sw_mag_plasma_2007052000.png|350px]]
 The blue lines are an approximation of the CME cloud and the red line denotes the shock.

← Older revision	Revision as of 18:37, 2 July 2013
(No difference)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:24, 1 July 2013
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	~~'''Published Paper'''~~	+	=Comment Section=
		+
		+	=Image Data=
		+	==In-Situ Data==
		+	A combination of SWEPAM and MAG data from the ACE Satellite: <br />
		+
		+	The blue lines are an approximation of the CME cloud and the red line denotes the shock.
		+
		+	=Video Data=
		+
		+	=References=
		+	*compression of the magnetic cloud through a high speed stream (Rouillard et al. paper)
	*Liu, Y., Luhmann, J. G., Huttunen, K. E. J., Lin, R. P., Bale, S. D., Russell, C. T., & Galvin, A. B. (2008). Reconstruction of the 2007 May 22 Magnetic Cloud: How Much Can We Trust the Flux-Rope Geometry of CMEs? Astrophysical Journal, 677(2), L133–L136. doi:10.1086/587839		*Liu, Y., Luhmann, J. G., Huttunen, K. E. J., Lin, R. P., Bale, S. D., Russell, C. T., & Galvin, A. B. (2008). Reconstruction of the 2007 May 22 Magnetic Cloud: How Much Can We Trust the Flux-Rope Geometry of CMEs? Astrophysical Journal, 677(2), L133–L136. doi:10.1086/587839

← Older revision	Revision as of 18:44, 24 June 2013
(No difference)

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:48, 19 June 2013
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''Published Paper'''		'''Published Paper'''
−	Liu, Y., Luhmann, J. G., Huttunen, K. E. J., Lin, R. P., Bale, S. D., Russell, C. T., & Galvin, A. B. (2008). Reconstruction of the 2007 May 22 Magnetic Cloud: How Much Can We Trust the Flux-Rope Geometry of CMEs? Astrophysical Journal, 677(2), L133–L136. doi:10.1086/587839	+	*Liu, Y., Luhmann, J. G., Huttunen, K. E. J., Lin, R. P., Bale, S. D., Russell, C. T., & Galvin, A. B. (2008). Reconstruction of the 2007 May 22 Magnetic Cloud: How Much Can We Trust the Flux-Rope Geometry of CMEs? Astrophysical Journal, 677(2), L133–L136. doi:10.1086/587839